"Massive networking promises that information is richly fused, creating secondary knowledge."
Is this sentence correct? I think it should be "that information would be richly fused, create secondary knowledge." Am I wrong?

Zobacz tłumaczenie

The first sentence is correct as it is.

The sentence could also be written as, "Massive networking promises that information is richly fused, therefore creating secondary knowledge."

This style of sentence is very professional and well-written to English speakers.

For your sentence to be correct, you would need to say this:
"Massive networks that are richly fused create secondary knowledge."

But here, we wouldn't want to put "," after "fused", because it would separate the noun from the verb into two clauses.

So this would be wrong:
"Massive networks that are richly fused, create secondary knowledge."

Each of these sentences have the same meaning, but the grammar of your second phrase is incorrect.

Other examples:

"He took the medicine, protecting his body."
"He drank the coffee, waking himself up before work."
"Dairy cows produce 28 liters of milk per day, providing milk over 10 months."